If anyone has time and enjoys doing this sort of thing, I would really like
to know what kind of centrifugal force is acting on that ball. Say from the
center out, in a 1mm wide path, how much force is pulling out? To keep it
simple lets assume the golf ball has equal density throughout, weighs 45
grams, and has a diameter of 43mm. You may also assume the 1mm path is flat
on all surfaces, effectively turning the shape into a 1mm thick cylinder. ?
so a golf ball , a funnel, and an air nozzle pull up to a drag strip…
@MichaelRMcCoy Okay, this isn’t worth wasting my time over. I will repeat
though, your numbers were pulled from your lovely looking anus, and I have
tried this in REAL LIFE. I hereby declare this flame war ‘over’. =)
@twaddlegenerator Pretty hard to overlook the fact that you’re avoiding
some of the most basic math imaginable — relating to the most indisputable
facts surrounding the claims in the video. It’s all in the golf ball’s
diameter [a known factor] and escaping 175 psi air [also a known factor].
The most optimum diameter orifice used to direct the air’s flow would be
around 3/32″, [smaller over-restricts and larger results in lower
velocity]. 125 mph air cannot propel a ball at 350 mph. Period.
I have a degree in mathematics, thanks. And it took about an hour of my
afternoon total. You see, other people aren’t as helpless as you are. I’ve
suspected it but now I know there’s no way you’re not a troll. Sorry that
you have to be you. It must suck.
Either you’re a troll with nothing better to do or incredibly
naive/ignorant.
72k rpm – 570km/h on surface, the ball would explode
Actually, model airplane engines are capable of turning about 35-40,000
rpms depending on the size and type…. Turbochargers hit these numbers
too. So not saying its right, but 70,000 certainly isn’t unreasonable.
You want some facts? Check out the video I posted. Clearly your figure of
2000rpm is completely ridiculous. Go crawl back into your hole. I don’t
know what profession you’re in, but if it’s engineering or science you
should be embarrassed. Actually you should be embarrassed anyway.
Even in the US most academics use the metric system for calculations.
seems legit
Apparently, sleeping the drunk off didn’t help.
0 :58 “You’ll never catch me now!”
Where are the 6 engineers? I just see a couple of auto mechanics messing
around?
Sorry, there is no way that ball is spinning at only 2000 rpm or anything
close to that. Do you hear the frequency of that noise? I bet if you
analyzed the audio the frequency of that noise would be WELL over only
333hz. It sounds more like 3000-4000hz or something. Auto engines spin
around 2,000rpm, this is way faster than that. Your basic premise on air
pressure vs. orifice size is flawed. There are pneumatic cutoff tools that
run on 90psi that spin at 22,000 rpm. How does that work genius
Coming from an mechanical background……..any DECENT mechanic/engineer
would have both. The US is one of the last few countries that uses this
“antiquated” system. If im asked my height I more often than not say 5’11.
If i was working out my body volume for some strange reason then id be in
mm. Much like most of the younger academics are in the US.
I must admit, I did ask you to demonstrate your ignorance further.– and
you came through spectacularly. Apparently, your laughable conclusions will
not be blurred by the most basic math imaginable. And it’s 3rd grad math.
6th grade math involves long division and fractions — likely to blow the
top of your brain bucket off. You’ve got way too much time on your hands,
sparky.
The golf ball ran away from them
they should use these in engines for cars Idk what for but it spins real
fast, :/ lol
@Darkcloud9071 I think the golf ball was spinning on an air cushion created
by comporessed air hose and the funnel was used to support it
How funny would it be if it flew out and fucked up his face?
@favre4beast The familiar tactic. Escape grasshopper — run like the wind
laddie. And leave my anus out of it.
@protegeaustin I dont believe you since you wrote BECUZ
good observation almost as good of a comment as protegeaustin
If anyone has time and enjoys doing this sort of thing, I would really like
to know what kind of centrifugal force is acting on that ball. Say from the
center out, in a 1mm wide path, how much force is pulling out? To keep it
simple lets assume the golf ball has equal density throughout, weighs 45
grams, and has a diameter of 43mm. You may also assume the 1mm path is flat
on all surfaces, effectively turning the shape into a 1mm thick cylinder. ?
so a golf ball , a funnel, and an air nozzle pull up to a drag strip…
@MichaelRMcCoy Okay, this isn’t worth wasting my time over. I will repeat
though, your numbers were pulled from your lovely looking anus, and I have
tried this in REAL LIFE. I hereby declare this flame war ‘over’. =)
@twaddlegenerator Pretty hard to overlook the fact that you’re avoiding
some of the most basic math imaginable — relating to the most indisputable
facts surrounding the claims in the video. It’s all in the golf ball’s
diameter [a known factor] and escaping 175 psi air [also a known factor].
The most optimum diameter orifice used to direct the air’s flow would be
around 3/32″, [smaller over-restricts and larger results in lower
velocity]. 125 mph air cannot propel a ball at 350 mph. Period.
I have a degree in mathematics, thanks. And it took about an hour of my
afternoon total. You see, other people aren’t as helpless as you are. I’ve
suspected it but now I know there’s no way you’re not a troll. Sorry that
you have to be you. It must suck.
Either you’re a troll with nothing better to do or incredibly
naive/ignorant.
72k rpm – 570km/h on surface, the ball would explode
Actually, model airplane engines are capable of turning about 35-40,000
rpms depending on the size and type…. Turbochargers hit these numbers
too. So not saying its right, but 70,000 certainly isn’t unreasonable.
You want some facts? Check out the video I posted. Clearly your figure of
2000rpm is completely ridiculous. Go crawl back into your hole. I don’t
know what profession you’re in, but if it’s engineering or science you
should be embarrassed. Actually you should be embarrassed anyway.
Even in the US most academics use the metric system for calculations.
seems legit
Apparently, sleeping the drunk off didn’t help.
0 :58 “You’ll never catch me now!”
Where are the 6 engineers? I just see a couple of auto mechanics messing
around?
Sorry, there is no way that ball is spinning at only 2000 rpm or anything
close to that. Do you hear the frequency of that noise? I bet if you
analyzed the audio the frequency of that noise would be WELL over only
333hz. It sounds more like 3000-4000hz or something. Auto engines spin
around 2,000rpm, this is way faster than that. Your basic premise on air
pressure vs. orifice size is flawed. There are pneumatic cutoff tools that
run on 90psi that spin at 22,000 rpm. How does that work genius
Coming from an mechanical background……..any DECENT mechanic/engineer
would have both. The US is one of the last few countries that uses this
“antiquated” system. If im asked my height I more often than not say 5’11.
If i was working out my body volume for some strange reason then id be in
mm. Much like most of the younger academics are in the US.
I must admit, I did ask you to demonstrate your ignorance further.– and
you came through spectacularly. Apparently, your laughable conclusions will
not be blurred by the most basic math imaginable. And it’s 3rd grad math.
6th grade math involves long division and fractions — likely to blow the
top of your brain bucket off. You’ve got way too much time on your hands,
sparky.
The golf ball ran away from them
they should use these in engines for cars Idk what for but it spins real
fast, :/ lol
@Darkcloud9071 I think the golf ball was spinning on an air cushion created
by comporessed air hose and the funnel was used to support it
How funny would it be if it flew out and fucked up his face?
@favre4beast The familiar tactic. Escape grasshopper — run like the wind
laddie. And leave my anus out of it.
@protegeaustin I dont believe you since you wrote BECUZ
good observation almost as good of a comment as protegeaustin
SAE tool designers/engineers, welders, steel manufacturers, wood
cutters/saw mills, carpenters/home builders, plumbers/pipe fitters,
surveyors/land developers, fencing companies, electricians, brick/block
layers, concrete contractors, architects/structural engineers, pole
vaulters (assorted athletic competitors), clothing manufacturers, tire
manufacturers, civil engineers, landscaping companies, furniture
manufacturers, vinyl siding makers, local/state/federal government, the US
military.